[Cc-nz] Time to retire ND and NC

Matt McGregor Matt.McGregor at royalsociety.org.nz
Mon Sep 17 18:45:29 EDT 2012


Hi all,

Paul, sorry, didn't mean to dodge this; my earlier answer was meant to respond to both of your questions

>> Do we know how many objects from New Zealand exist with any CC 
>> licences

We don't have any reliable information on this. As you know, one of the great things about CC is that it's open, which means that users don't have to register before using a licence. This means that tracking licence use--and estimating the amount of licensed objects--can be a headache.

CCHQ are working on their estimates for a global count at the moment, but that won't be finished for some time. I've no plans to do a NZ version of this at the moment.

Cheers,
Matt

-----Original Message-----
From: cc-nz-bounces at lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:cc-nz-bounces at lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Matt McGregor
Sent: Monday, 17 September 2012 10:04 AM
To: Creative Commons Aotearoa New Zealand discussion
Subject: Re: [Cc-nz] Time to retire ND and NC

Hi everyone,

>> On Sep 15, 2012 12:33 PM, "Bronwyn Holloway-Smith" wrote:

>>         There is still a lot of work to be done before CC is widely 
>> understood and used by the general public and IMHO retaining NC will 
>> lower the barrier to entry for those who are new to, and wary of the
system.

I tend to agree. It's much easier, rhetorically, to point out that CC provides 'a range of licence options, ranging from more free to more restrictive.'

On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Leigh Blackall <leighblackall at gmail.com> wrote:
> Paul, I'm not sure anyone is making out that all rights reserved is 
> evil, though I somewhat detest the moralist language used, like 
> "freedom" and "sharing", that more than suggest one is evil and the
other is not.

Without denying the moralism that sometimes creeps into these discussions, the case we make to CC neophytes is more often a pragmatic one. The case against All Rights Reserved is not that it's evil, but that it simply doesn't suit most fields of cultural practice, (including education, government, research, most areas of the arts). The case for CC is not (just) that it's the right thing to do, but that it can make one's job/life easier. The inflection of 'freedom' is thus more technical than moral: you can simply do more with CC-BY than CC-BY-NC-ND or ARR.

And I agree that 'sharing' can sound a little cuddly, but it's also a pretty good description of quite a lot of online cultural practice.

> I think proponents of CC carry an assumption, that seamless reuse of 
> cultural artifacts, in a digital medium and culture of reuse, is 
> valuable and important to cultural continuation and development. this 
> assumption might need some careful reflection, as you suggest.

Yes, a more nuanced, historically informed theory of culture would be useful. It would be nice to have a history which showed the links between Lessig's theory of 'culture' and those going back to the late 18th century, in the style, say, of 'Culture & Society.' Any takers?

> On Sep 16, 2012 7:25 PM, "Sutherland, Paul" 
> <Paul.Sutherland at ccc.govt.nz>
> wrote:

>> I wonder what evidence there is about the usage of CC-NZ and its 
>> various permutations full stop
>>
>> Do we know how many objects from New Zealand exist with any CC 
>> licences
>>
>> Somewhere to look that up?

Jane recently pointed me to this, though it's extremely out of date (2010), and is taken from search engines:
http://monitor.creativecommons.org/New_Zealand

>> And how much reuse there is actually occuring

Not sure of any research on this from Aotearoa.

Cheers,
Matt

--
Creative Commons Aotearoa New Zealand
Twitter: @cc_aotearoa
_______________________________________________
cc-nz mailing list
cc-nz at lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-nz
Creative Commons Aotearoa New Zealand
http://www.creativecommons.org.nz/
**********************************************************************
This electronic email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.

The views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the Christchurch City Council.

If you are not the correct recipient of this email please advise the sender and delete.

Christchurch City Council
http://www.ccc.govt.nz
**********************************************************************

_______________________________________________
cc-nz mailing list
cc-nz at lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-nz
Creative Commons Aotearoa New Zealand
http://www.creativecommons.org.nz/


More information about the cc-nz mailing list