[cc-licenses] CC ShareAlike: Include a requirement for source form of the work?

Arne Babenhauserheide arne_bab at web.de
Mon Feb 2 13:42:43 EST 2015


Am Sonntag, 1. Februar 2015, 15:30:31 schrieb Rob Myers:
> > I recently took 6 minutes of HD video the resulting file is 800Mb
> > and I've not begun to process it yet. A family member works with
> > professional broadcast film and they rarely handle file packages
> > that are less that 100Gb.
> 
> Remember that the GPL allows you to charge costs to deliver the source
> "on a durable physical medium". So if it would take two dozen hard
> disks to send me the source, that's what I would have to pay for.
> 
> A source requirement isn't going to be added, but it's not as
> outlandish for professional/semi-professional production as it might seem.

I understand why this is not suitable for creativecommons: Most people
simply won’t need the raw files, but the requirement to keep the raw
files around would keep many people from publishing or re-using under
cc by-sa.

For programs (and anything which needs the GPL) a source-requirement
is needed to get a reasonable measure of reusability. For most
cultural works, that would be a deterrent for reuse, simply because
most users of the works won’t be able to keep up with that and would
walk very insecure legal territory when they decide to finally throw
away those old raw files because they need more space on their hard
disks.

Or when they just do a quick remix of two or three videos and only
have little webspace available.

Best wishes,
Arne
--
Celebrate with ye beauty and gather yer friends for a Pirate Party!
    → http://1w6.org/english/flyerbook-rules#pirate-party ←

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 299 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/attachments/20150202/307483c4/attachment.sig>


More information about the cc-licenses mailing list