[cc-licenses] TPMs & Open Access
nicholas at commonrights.com
Fri Jan 18 02:37:54 EST 2013
Sarah, Greg, Heather,
I have a follow-up question to this discussion of TPM's.
If the file/work in question has has identifiers/fingerprinting attached to
it which help identify the right holder, author, CC licensor, ..., but
does not restrict access to the file is that considered a TPM? I assume the
identifications, whatever, could be construed as protecting the rights
associated with the file but not the file itself. But, does this mean that
licensee does not have the right under the 'TPM' clause to remove these
identifiers if they don't restrict access? Should a distinction be made
between technical measures protecting rights and those protecting access to
Thanks for the clarification,
On 17 January 2013 17:31, Greg Grossmeier <greg at grossmeier.net> wrote:
> Hello Heather,
> <quote name="Heather Morrison" date="2013-01-16" time="13:06:47 -0800">
> > One question that I have which comes up with respect to open access
> > works: what about paywalls imposed by a downstream licensor that are
> > not applied TO the work, but rather something people need to address
> > in order to get TO the work. I'm not sure if it is even possible to
> > preclude this - most of us have to pay for internet access, so one
> > could argue that everything on the internet is behind a paywall.
> You point to the general underpinning of the issue; everything in the
> world, unfortunately, costs something to gain access to, other than air
> (for now).
> It has never been the interpretation of CC, to my knowledge, that a
> paywall (or other login mechanism) was a TPM.
> Keep in mind the reason for the TPM clause is to address the DRM issue,
> which prevents people *who already have the file/work* from using it in
> ways that the license allows. It isn't about people gaining access to
> the file/work in the first place.
> | Greg Grossmeier GPG: B2FA 27B1 F7EB D327 6B8E |
> | http://grossmeier.net A18D 1138 8E47 FAC8 1C7D |
> List info and archives at
> Unsubscribe at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/cc-licenses
> In consideration of people subscribed to this list to participate
> in the CC licenses http://wiki.creativecommons.org/4.0 development
> process, please direct unrelated discussions to the cc-community list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the cc-licenses