[cc-licenses] Clarification for Non-Derivative License: grayscale from color not a derivative work

Gregor Hagedorn g.m.hagedorn at gmail.com
Wed Jan 4 15:11:30 EST 2012

> permission, is less likely to be considered a derivative work (if a

> standard algorithm is used, it seems to me there would be no added
> creativity, therefore it would be a copy, not a derivative work).

I fully agree on the less likely, and I believe a clarification statement
in the license would not be a change of license. My request to make this
explicit is not meant to deal with an intricate legal situation but to
avoid the of discussions whether it is or is not allowed.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/attachments/20120104/a51b997a/attachment.html 

More information about the cc-licenses mailing list