[cc-licenses] Compatibility with the Free Art License
luis at tieguy.org
Sat Dec 24 12:21:59 EST 2011
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Rob Myers <rob at robmyers.org> wrote:
> On 23/12/11 19:05, Valentin Villenave wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Rob Myers <rob at robmyers.org> wrote:
>>> I think LAL 1.3 is more than good enough in itself and close enough to
>>> BY-SA that compatibility is something that could be considered now.
>> BTW Rob, still waiting for that "FAL weakens copyleft" blog post of yours :-)
> It may have evaporated. The concerns I had are addressed by 1.3 as far
> as I can tell. Yes, I hadn't looked at it for a while... :-)
Possibly a dumb question, but what are the salient features of
FAL/LAL? Why would one use it instead of CC-SA?
More information about the cc-licenses