[cc-licenses] Parallel Distribution Statement
zotz at 100jamz.com
Wed Nov 29 18:47:00 EST 2006
On Wednesday 29 November 2006 05:32 pm, Francesco Poli wrote:
> Wait one second: are you claiming that CC-v3.0draft anti-DRM clause is
> equivalent to GPLv3draft2 one?
> Does the same hold for the CC-v3.0draft anti-DRM clause?
Let's see if we can ask a question here...
Is everyone who wants the anti-tpm clause, and does not want the parallel
distribution option, ok with the parallel distribution option so long as it
only applies where anyone can freely apply the drm for the platform in
Unless someone can convince me otherwise, I would accepth that as a
compromise. (If I worded my meaning properly at least.)
all the best,
(da idea man)
National Novel Writing Month
861,535,038 words and counting.
More information about the cc-licenses