[cc-licenses] Creative Commons & Copyleft question?

Peter Brink peter.brink at brinkdata.se
Mon Aug 28 15:41:02 EDT 2006

Peter Brink skrev:
> Charles Iliya Krempeaux skrev:
>  > If the answer is "no", then will the CC 3.0 contain anything like
>  > that? I.e., where embedding a BY-SA image or video into a webpage, via
>  > the HTML <img>, <embed>, or <object> elements, would make that webpage
>  > a "derivative work" and make it become BY-SA too?
> AFAIK, the answer is no - and why should it? An embedded image is no 
> derivative work, why should we allow for such an extension of the 
> licensor's rights?

Having reviewed the 3.0 generic license draft, I can confirm that there 
is no prosed change. The language of the 2.5 and 3.0 licenses are in 
this respect basically the same. The only, minor, difference is that the 
3.0 generic license replaces the word (and concept of) "derivative work" 
with "adaptation".

/Peter Brink

More information about the cc-licenses mailing list