[cc-licenses] After Disney or: Help Robot George Get A Life
larsporsena at gmail.com
Thu Aug 10 06:32:39 EDT 2006
> Except I thought the requirements included
> holding exclusive commercial rights to the
> "Organization", and granting the community only
> NonCommercial rights.
yes, that is correct. I think Rob was making a plea for
leaky buckets :)
BTW, I like the Magnatune model a lot though, great idea:
non-exclusive use, 50% split followed by CC-BY-SA-NC
opens the party up a lot more to individual creators.
Even better in this case, where use is non-exclusive it effectively
forces (always good) the Org to be all the things it should/could:
eg a solid citizen, effective brand, promoter of talent.
I'm strongly tempted by this.
It's a pity Magnatune is obviously wildly unsuccessful: do we draw
any conclusions here?
Or: is anybody else using CC licenses at the heart of a business model
and actually making a go of it? A flip round the CC website suggests not.
More information about the cc-licenses