[cc-fr] Fwd: Dutch Court upholds Creative Commons license
melanie dulong de rosnay
melanie.dulong-de-rosnay at cersa.org
Tue Mar 14 12:46:15 EST 2006
Bonjour,
Voici le compte-rendu de la décision d'un tribunal d'Amsterdam : un
magazine n'a pas le droit de reproduire des photos publiées sous
contrat Creative Commons BY-NC-SA sans l'autorisation de l'auteur.
Dutch Court upholds Creative Commons license
Photographs made available on flickr.com under a Creative Commons
Attribution-Noncommercial-Sharealike license may not be reproduced in
a weekly magazine without the author’s permission.
On March 9, 2006 the District Court of Amsterdam, judging in summary
proceedings, decided the first court case in the Netherlands
involving the validity of a Creative Commons license. Local media
celebrity Adam Curry (see http://curry.podshow.com/?p=49) had
published photo’s of his family on www.flickr.com under a Creative
Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Sharealike license. The photos also
carried the notice ‘This photo is public’. The Dutch weekly Weekend,
a gossip magazine, had reproduced four photos in a story on Curry’s
children without seeking Curry’s prior permission.
Curry sued Weekend for copyright and privacy infringement. As to the
copyright claim, Weekend argued that it was misled by the notice
‘this photo is public’, and that the link to the CC license was not
obvious. Audax, the publisher of Weekend, alleged that it was
informed of the existence of the CC license only much later by its
legal counsel. In sum, Weekend had assumed in good faith that no
authorization from Curry was needed. Moreover, Curry had not incurred
any damages by the publication of the photos in Weekend, since the
photos were freely available to the public on flickr.
The Court rejected Weekend’s defense, and held as follows:
“All four photos that were taken from www.flickr.com were made by
Curry and posted by him on that website. In principle, Curry owns the
copyright in the four photos, and the photos, by posting them on that
website, are subject to the [Creative Commons] License. Therefore
Audax should observe the conditions that control the use by third
parties of the photos as stated in the License. The Court understands
that Audax was misled by the notice ‘This photo is public’ (and
therefore did not take note of the conditions of the License).
However, it may be expected from a professional party like Audax that
it conduct a thorough and precise examination before publishing in
Weekend photos originating from the internet. Had it conducted such
an investigation, Audax would have clicked on the symbol
accompyinying the notice ‘some rights reserved’ and encountered the
(short version of) the License. In case of doubt as to the
applicability and the contents of the License, it should have
requested authorization for publication from the copyright holder of
the photos (Curry). Audax has failed to perform such a detailed
investigation, and has assumed too easily thet publication of the
photos was allowed. Audax has not observed the conditions stated in
the License […]. The claim […] will therefore be allowed; defendants
will be enjoined from publishing all photos that [Curry] has
published on www.flickr.com, unless this occurs in accordance with
the conditions of the License.”
The Dutch Court’s decision is especially noteworthy because it
confirms that the conditions of a Creative Commons license
automatically apply to the content licensed under it, and bind users
of such content even without expressly agreeing to, or having
knowledge of, the conditions of the license.
The full text of the decision (in Dutch) is available at http://
zoeken.rechtspraak.nl/zoeken/dtluitspraak.asp?
searchtype=ljn&ljn=AV4204&u_ljn=AV4204
Bernt Hugenholtz
P. Bernt Hugenholtz
Institute for Information Law
University of Amsterdam
Rokin 84
NL-1012 KX Amsterdam
The Netherlands
hugenholtz at ivir.nl
http://www.ivir.nl
tel +31-20-5253925
fax +31-20-5253033
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-fr/attachments/20060314/4a6fd9cd/attachment.html
More information about the cc-fr
mailing list