[cc-devel] ccREL question
mz at kl.nl
Mon Mar 16 09:47:15 EDT 2015
I see your point, the working group will publish a white paper about the topic within the next following days. I will post a link to it here so you can see what we envision.
Kennisland | www.kl.nl | t +31205756720 | m +31643053919 | @mzeinstra
> On 13 Mar 2015, at 4:20 , Mike Linksvayer <ml at gondwanaland.com> wrote:
> On 03/12/2015 08:31 AM, Maarten Zeinstra wrote:
>> So you would actually advise not using the CC:License term in this case?
> Assuming this case is something like deciding the range of edm:rights
> then yes I would advise using dcterms:RightsStatement rather than
> cc:License. Your schema would be more accurate if less precise. It would
> unquestionably allow objects that aren't licenses but instead are public
> domain or other copyright status determinations, even objects which
> themselves have a license property, much like the ODRS example you
> linked to.
More information about the cc-devel