[cc-devel] More review of liblicense changes since 0.4
asheesh at creativecommons.org
Wed Jan 9 18:19:05 EST 2008
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> Further, pmiller has suggested we stick to C89 constructs. I'm feeling
> generous today, so I'll consider that reasonable. If we do want to stick
> to it, we should modify our compile process so that with GCC we used
> -std=c89 or -ansi so that the codebase does not compile with non-C89
I just tried std=c89, and xdgmime has comments in // style. If our
dependencies aren't going to be C89, I see no reason we should be.
New position: Screw C89, let's stick with std=gnu89.
Eighty percent of married men cheat in America. The rest cheat in Europe.
-- Jackie Mason
More information about the cc-devel