[cc-community] Does license applicable for all resolutions?
jkadavoor at gmail.com
Mon Dec 2 01:38:03 EST 2013
I think the license is applicable to whatever material that is provided
there; not to its source materials. CC 4.0 started to use the
word "Licensed Material" instead of "Work". For a simple photograph, the
source may also simple. But it is no so in all cases. Consider a focus
stacked macro or a gigapan panorama. There may be 100+ source files behind
it. Do we get the license for all those source files? Is the answer is
"yes"; better switch to "all rights reserved" and think about granting
permission in a case to case basic. :)
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 7:08 AM, Emma Carpenter <emma.k.carpenter at live.com>wrote:
> On 02/12/2013 12:02 AM, Rob Myers wrote:
> > Surely just keeping the image proprietary and granting permissions
> > when asked would be even better.
> That depends on what you're trying to achieve. If the artist wants to be
> paid for commerical uses of the high res version of the image, then
> using NC is better, because that way the content is part of the commons
> for NC use, but the artist doesn't lose his income from commercial uses.
> If the artist doesn't want anyone using the high res image at all
> without permission and/or payment, then NC won't work, and proprietary
> is the only option. If there is a CC licence which will work, then it is
> always superior as compared to proprietary licences, because it
> massively reduces the overhead involved in reuse of the work. That is,
> after all, the whole purpose of the Creative Commons. :)
> List info and archives at
> Unsubscribe at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/cc-community
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the cc-community