[cc-community] What are your thoughts on [opt-in] anti-tivoization in CC-BY-SA 4.0?

Jeremy Malcolm jeremy at ciroap.org
Wed Dec 21 23:31:49 EST 2011

On 22/12/11 12:26, Anthony wrote:
> The reason to put such encryption on a BY-SA work is so that it plays
> in DVD players (my understanding is that at least some DVD players
> will not play unencrypted DVDs).

Then such defective DVD players would not play home-produced DVDs
either, as these are not encoded with CSS.


*Dr Jeremy Malcolm
Project Coordinator*
Consumers International
Kuala Lumpur Office for Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala Lumpur,
Tel: +60 3 7726 1599

*The global voice for consumers*: www.consumersinternational.org
*Connect with CI*: Twitter _ at ConsumersInt
<http://twitter.com/Consumers_Int>_ |
*Help CI stay in touch:* please also add
ConsumersInternational at sut1.co.uk
<mailto:ConsumersInternational at sut1.co.uk> to your safe sender list

Read our email confidentiality notice
<http://www.consumersinternational.org/email-confidentiality>. Don't
print this email unless necessary.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-community/attachments/20111222/0e15fc63/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2370 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-community/attachments/20111222/0e15fc63/attachment.bin 

More information about the cc-community mailing list