osm at inbox.org
Wed Dec 14 18:47:02 EST 2011
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Joe Corneli <holtzermann17 at gmail.com> wrote:
> This isn't really a point worthy of debate.
Then don't debate it.
> The more relevant charge
More relevant for what? For his legal team? Sure. I wasn't talking
about his legal problems, though. I was talking about his alleged
I said "I don't think we should engage in theft in order to benefit
the commons." If MIT and JSTOR gave Swartz permission to use their
equipment to download those documents, then I don't see what he did
wrong. The allegations are that he didn't have permission.
More information about the cc-community