beholder0x100 at gmail.com
Wed Dec 14 17:29:09 EST 2011
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Joe Corneli <holtzermann17 at gmail.com>wrote:
> Are NC/ND works contributing to a rich commons? It's not entirely
> clear that they are. For example, there are things like Kahn Academy,
> but Salman Kahn could have released everything on YouTube without the
> CC-By-NC-SA license, and would it have made a difference? It seems to
> me that the CC-By-NC-SA license is a bit of an afterthought. The
> technology (free videos) was the main idea. Does the license matter
> at all in this case?
My hope is that CC-By-NC-SA is a starting point and that it slowly drills a
hole in a heart telling it to do the next logical step and drop NC part.
Without such "continuity" (eg. if NC licences will be re-branded) this
could be less likely to happen.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the cc-community