[cc-community] CC needs a default form of attribution?

Evan Prodromou evan at prodromou.name
Mon Apr 28 13:53:13 EDT 2008

Chris Watkins wrote:
> From iterating toward openness - Why Not CC By? 
> <http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/366>:  'The Attribution 
> requirement of all CC licenses, including CC By, states "You must 
> attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor." 
> Now, I ask you - have you ever seen a page with a CC license that 
> specifies how the work should be attributed?'
That's just bad writing in the license deeds, and I wish it were 
changed. The attribution requirement says that you must show the name of 
the author or designated organization, the original title, note any 
changes you've made, and a licensing URL if it's included. Licensors are 
not free to make up weird attribution demands on their own.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-community/attachments/20080428/d5e1d42e/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5246 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-community/attachments/20080428/d5e1d42e/attachment.bin 

More information about the cc-community mailing list