[b-hebrew] ] A VISUAL EXPRESSION OF A THEOLOGICAL IDEA OF THESKY/HEAVEN ( Rolf's Response 4)
George.Athas at moore.edu.au
Wed Sep 5 17:32:05 EDT 2012
Sorry, Ted, but that's taking your own definition and expectation of what should and shouldn't be classified as 'THE' beginning, and using that as the measure; or it is assuming that the writer of Gen 1 had your definitions. Either way, this is a backward method, I'm afraid. The question is what the writer thought he/she was doing. This is not a theological question that seeks to answer the question through what other biblical writers may have expressed, but rather a literary question: what does the author of specifically Gen 1 want to convey?
Dean of Research,
Moore Theological College (moore.edu.au)
From: "tedbro at aol.com<mailto:tedbro at aol.com>" <tedbro at aol.com<mailto:tedbro at aol.com>>
Date: Thursday, 6 September 2012 7:18 AM
To: George Athas <george.athas at moore.edu.au<mailto:george.athas at moore.edu.au>>, B-Hebrew <b-hebrew at lists.ibiblio.org<mailto:b-hebrew at lists.ibiblio.org>>
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] ] A VISUAL EXPRESSION OF A THEOLOGICAL IDEA OF THESKY/HEAVEN ( Rolf's Response 4)
Whether Gen 1 describes creation ex niliho depends on the vowel under the initial bet in v.1. If we read BA it's ex niliho. If we read Be (shva) it's not.
More information about the b-hebrew