[b-hebrew] how to cite non-English on this list
kwrandolph at gmail.com
Wed Jul 18 23:09:03 EDT 2012
Should not the question be, who on this list is still tied to a mail server
that cannot present UTF-8 encoding?
I originally switched to gmail because the mail service I was using could
show unicode, but not allow me to send same. Today it is UTF-8 compliant.
All the email servers that I know of are UTF-8 compliant. So are there any
members of this list who cannot receive and/or send unicode?
If everyone can receive and send unicode, is there any reason to continue
the transcription scheme?
Karl W. Randolph.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Will Parsons <wbparsons at alum.mit.edu>wrote:
> Hello, fellow subscribers to the Biblical Hebrew mailing list,
> What's the current feeling about using Unicode/UTF-8 encoding for citing
> non-English text (e.g., Hebrew [obviously], Greek, Arabic, &c.), or
> pronunciations (using IPA symbols)? Historically, it's been considered
> proper to use only 7-bit ASCII in Usenet or mailing lists, but sometimes
> in the case of this mailing list) it's difficult to do this adequately.
> In my own posts to this list in the past, I've attempted to deal with this
> by citing original forms in Unicode with a transcription into the "usual"
> English representation of the original, hoping that this will satisfy both
> the needs of those that can both read and understand the original forms and
> also of those that may not be able to see the original characters (i.e.,
> can't see the Hebrew/Greek/Arabic/[whatever] text) or be able to undestand
> it (obviously, not everyone can be knowledgable about every language that
> may be relevant to Biblical Hebrew).
> So, I would like to ask if people on this list have issues with reading
> Unicode? To be clear, I am *not* asking whether people can understand
> Greek/Arabic/[whatever], but whether they can actually see a cited text as
> something other than gibberish.
> William Parsons
> μη φαινεσθαι, αλλ' ειναι.
More information about the b-hebrew