[b-hebrew] Early and late biblical Hebrew
JimStinehart at aol.com
JimStinehart at aol.com
Mon Nov 28 14:57:46 EST 2011
Rob Acosta, in response to my assertion that "If we don’t realize how
thoroughly Canaan was dominated by Hurrian princelings in the mid-14th century
BCE [per the Amarna Letters], we will not appreciate the enormity of the
Hebrews managing to accomplish precisely what Genesis 15: 18-21 says", wrote:
“I see you continue to purport a completely false view of the chronology of
the Amarna letters for the sole purpose if supporting your theories. You
should be honest with the readers and acknowledge upfront your views are your
invention based on your own studies and that you ignored the works of
experts on the Amarna Letters such as EF Campbell , William Moran, and Donald
Redford. In all cases the chronologies put forth by these scholars and
others disagree with yours.”
On the contrary, there is overwhelming scholarly support for my stated view
above that “Canaan was dominated by Hurrian princelings in the mid-14th
century BCE [per the Amarna Letters]”:
“From the Amarna texts we can draw the conclusion that the Hurrian
component of the population is to be recognized all over the country. Many of the
rulers of Canaan have non-Semitic names, mostly Hurrian…. These names may
indicate that the Hurrians had become the upper classes of the urban societies
in Palestine.” Gosta Werner Ahlstrom, “The History of Ancient Palestine”
(1993), pp. 249-250.
“The Bekaa and Jordan Valleys shared this influence with citizens and town
leaders of many of the sites in this region bearing Hurrian or other
northern names, as attested in the Amarna correspondence and other cuneiform
evidence. For example, note the following Hurrian or Indo-Aryan names in the
region: i-tag-ga14-ma of Kadesh; ti4-wa-te at Lapana; a-ra-wa-na at Kumidi;
ma-ya-ar-za-ni at Xasi; ya-mi-u-ta at Guddashuna; a-ki-iz-zi at Qatna;
a-ki-Te$$up at Tunib; bir5-ya-wa-za at Damascus; ar-ta-ma-an-ya at
Ziri-Bashan; bi-ri-da-a$-wa at Ashtaroth; da-$a (as a shortened form of or an
equivalent name for bi-ri-da-a$-wa?). This influence extended westward through
the Jezreel Valley where it reached Megiddo, Achshaph and Acco. These sites
are associated with the names, bi-ri-di-ya and in-tar-u-ta at Megiddo and A
chshaph, and the names sa-ta-at-na and su-ra-ta at Acco.” Richard S. Hess,
“‘Geshurite’ Onomastica of the Bronze and Iron Ages”, in Rami Arav and
Richard A. Freund, editors, “Bethsaida: A City by the North Shore of the Sea
of Galilee” (2004), p. 53.
Hurrian princeling rulers were so pervasive in Canaan in the 14th century
BCE that Egyptians sometimes called the entire area “Hurri-land”. (Brief
comments in brackets are by me.)
“The king of Jerusalem during the Amarna Age was Abdu-Hepa [actually
IR-Heba], whose name indicates his Hurrian ancestry (Hepa was a Hurrian goddess).
…The Hurrian impact on Palestinian politics became so noticeable that the
Egyptians sometimes referred to Palestine as ‘Hurri-land’ or ‘Hurru’. The
Bible refers to these people as ‘Horites’ [XRY, better transliterated as ‘
Hurrians’].” George E. Mendenhall and Gary A. Herion, “Ancient Israel’s
Faith and History” (2001), at p. 32.
“Farther south -- in inland Syria and Palestine -- …in some Egyptian
sources dating from the Eighteenth Dynasty this region is referred to as Khor
(or Kharu [alternatively transliterated as ‘Hurri’]). It has been pointed
out by Gardiner that the name probably came to be applied as the result of
contact by the conquering Egyptian armies with ‘no inconsiderable portion’ of
the population who called themselves Hurri and that in time this term came
to be applied to the inhabitants as a whole, irrespective of whether they
were of Semitic or non-Semitic stock….” Claire Epstein, “Palestinian Bichrome
Ware” (1966), p. 153.
“The social formation of Canaan, as suggested by the Amarna correspondence
of the fourteenth century B.C.,…[as to] the name bearers who ruled…
throughout Canaan…[provides an] onomastic profile of the elite classes in Canaan in
the fourteenth century B.C. …In particular, the presence of northerners,
with personal names containing Anatolian, Indo-Aryan and especially Hurrian
elements was noted. …There is no doubt that a northern [primarily Hurrian]
cultural presence did exist in Late Bronze Age Palestine and in regions to
the north and east.” Richard S. Hess, “Hurrians and Other Inhabitants of
Late Bronze Age Palestine”, Levant XXIX (1997), at pp. 153, 155.
“[B]y the time of the Amarna letters there can be no doubt that Hurrians
had penetrated deeply and in considerable numbers into Palestine. …[T]he
Biblical Horites [XRY, using “X” or “x” here to represent an underdotted H, a
type of heth] are identical with the Hurrians of the cuneiform and
hieroglyphic inscriptions. Xori [XRY]is identical with xurri (cf. Eg. xuru, Ug.
xry and Acc. xurri), Palestine is known as xuru (xr) in Egyptian inscriptions….
” Joseph Blenkinsopp, “Gibeon and Israel” (Cambridge at the University
Press 1972), p. 15.
“Horites [XRY, at Genesis 14: 6]. …[T]he proper spelling and etymology is
‘Hurrians’. They had migrated to southern Canaan after 1500 B.C. in such
large numbers that the Egyptians typically called the area ‘the land of the
Hurru’ in the Late Bronze Age (as in the Merneptah Stele [from the late 13th
century BCE]). Many kings of the Canaanite city-states in the Amarna
period have Hurrian names.” William G. Dever, “Who Were the Early Israelites
and Where Did They Come From?” (2006), p. 220.
More information about the b-hebrew