[b-hebrew] Why a whole thread?
kwrandolph at gmail.com
Tue Dec 14 17:32:17 EST 2010
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Randall Buth <randallbuth at gmail.com> wrote:
> why was there a whole thread devoted to Song 1.12
Because your proposed answer below makes no sense, as far as we understand
> and trying to read hmlk as a verbal NOUN?
That part (verbal noun) doesn’t make sense to me either.
> A verbal noun phrase would not have needed/
> wanted the sh-.
The phrase in Biblical Hebrew עד אשר (more colloquially -עד ש ) is always
followed either by a verbal phrase (once as a pronoun followed by a
participle, other times a qatal or yiqtol with sometimes an added adverb כה,
אם or לא to modify the verb), or followed by the result of a verb earlier in
the sentence, without a definite article.
> why not recognize that
> sh- (//asher) introduces clauses
> and that here you have a 'verbless clause'?
> which brings one back to the simple ha-melex.
OK, how’d you translate the verse?
> Randall Buth, PhD
> randallbuth at gmail.com
> Biblical Language Center
> Learn Easily - Progress Further - Remember for Life
> Karl W. Randolph.
More information about the b-hebrew