[b-hebrew] Inseparable Prepositions and that shewa
vadimcherny at gmail.com
Tue Apr 20 13:47:21 EDT 2010
Though not attested, there's no doubt about the absence of dagesh kal
Binchem has no gemination; what except intonational difference in
chanting can explain its difference from michtav?
Speaking of gemination, no nun in gav, yet gabcha. What we see here is
kal rather than hazak. The Masoretes used kal to forcibly syllabify:
The word bittakhem ('your daughter') is not attested in the Bible.
syllabification is obviously different from mikht at v because the second
letter is doubled to compensate for the loss of the -n- from original
More information about the b-hebrew