[b-hebrew] Linguistics

Isaac Fried if at math.bu.edu
Fri Jun 27 14:55:35 EDT 2008


1. We moving in circles and becoming, I am afraid, tiresome. This  
discussion may also belong in a Linguistics forum not here, but it  
has, nevertheless, at its core, a fundamental issue pertaining to  
2. Linguistics is not an exact science, if at all, and one can not  
"demonstrate" anything by the force of its use.
3. The assertion that "general linguistics can define meaning/ 
semantics" is patently and thoroughly paltry. We don't need "general  
linguistics" to DEFINE something.
4. What you call "linguistic methodology" is of concern to students  
of linguistics only, it has no bearing whatsoever on the study of  
Hebrew etymology and grammar. For example, the question if a certain  
"linguistic unit" is a morpheme or not is of interest to a  
linguistics student only, wanting on a test to please his professor  
and get a good grade. Otherwise, the correct answer to this question  
5. You are making a grave mistake in spurning my ideas on the  
structure of the Hebrew word. They are possibly the most significant,  
if not the ultimate, contribution to the understanding of the Hebrew  
language in the last 1000 years. If you miss them it will be your own  
great loss.

Isaac Fried, Boston University

More information about the b-hebrew mailing list