[b-hebrew] Ps 40:6
if at math.bu.edu
Wed Oct 17 23:30:31 EDT 2007
(RK is a member of the root family )RX, )RK, (RK, all essentially
meaning 'to array or arrange in a linear or in a sequential order',
and by implication 'to estimate length, to asses value, to size, to
fix a scale, to argue or demonstrate deductively by logical steps, to
plan. They are also related to the roots RHH [see Isaiah 44:8], RKK,
and RQQ, all meaning 'to be soft, to be pliable, to be extensible'.
Also to the roots RXQ and RQX.
From the root )RX we have: )ORAX, 'way, life-style', )ORXAH,
'caravan, a series of beasts', )ARUXAH, '[lengthy] meal [of several
dishes]', and [the non biblical] )ARIAX, 'tile'.
From the root )RK we have )AROK, 'long, extended'.
From the root (RK we have: (EREK, 'value', and MA-(ARAK, 'arrangement'.
It appears to me that the )EYN (AROK )ELEYKA of Psalms 40:7 means
'you are incomparable, you are inestimable, you are unsurpassed, you
are incommensurable, you have no definite value'.
I see other interesting uses of the root (RK in Psalms 5:4 and 50:21.
The fact that these roots include the letter R is a sure indication,
in my opinion, that they all refer to a state of dispersion or
Isaac Fried, Boston University
On Oct 16, 2007, at 7:03 PM, JBarach at aol.com wrote:
> B-Haverim --
> Any suggestions on how to understand (and translate) the phrase at
> the end
> of the second line of Ps. 40:6?
> I've seen that line rendered "Your thoughts toward us cannot be
> recounted to
> you in order" (NKJV) or "reckoned up in order" (KJV), presumably
> taking ערך,
> which has the root sense of laying something out or stacking
> something up,
> as having to do with setting things out in order in words. It's
> possible that
> that's how the phrase is used in Job 32:14.
> Others take this phrase to refer to *comparison*: "There is no
> with you!" The context does suggest occasion for such a comment,
> given that
> the previous verse speaks of those who are turning aside to "a
> lie" (i.e., a f
> alse god). But is this phrase ever used elsewhere for
> comparison? The verse
> that is often cited as proof of this possibility is Isaiah 40:18,
> but that
> isn't exactly this phrase!
> With the addition of אל, however, it seems that the phrase often
> has to do
> with setting an army in order, arraying an army, against someone.
> Even in
> Job 32:14, where it is words that are being laid out (in order),
> the sense of
> opposition is still present.
> Would it be correct, then, to understand the last half of this line as
> saying something like "There is no one arrayed against you" --
> perhaps in the
> sense "No one can be arrayed against you (and succeed)?" The whole
> line would
> then be understood this way: "As for your thoughts toward us -- no
> one can be
> arrayed against you (successfully)."
> Any help you could provide would be appreciated. In particular,
> it would
> help if any of you have the technology that allows you to list all
> the passages
> where this verb is used with אל. That's something I can't search
> for on my
> computer and I'd like to be able to study those passages.
> ************************************** See what's new at http://
> b-hebrew mailing list
> b-hebrew at lists.ibiblio.org
More information about the b-hebrew