[b-hebrew] MX&OP in Gen 30:37

Yaakov Stein yaakov_s at rad.com
Mon Nov 26 15:55:45 EST 2007


> This is a participle, part of a subordinate clause. The whole phrase
> ????? ???? ???? ?? ??????
> making bare the white which was upon the sticks.

Which is, as I said originally, what the classic commentators say

This is certainly a possibility, and being a participle explains why
is no "et" as one would expect from other verb forms.

But do you agree with the massoretic vocalization with a "holam haser" ?

I can't think of any other examples of the grammatical form M--O-
used in this way.

Isaac saw the form as a noun, 
more particularly the MA being "the thing which is". 
This fits the grammatical form, but leaves the syntax problematic.

Yaakov (J) Stein

More information about the b-hebrew mailing list