[b-hebrew] Language, migration and Jewish identity
yitzhaksapir at gmail.com
Fri Nov 9 09:34:23 EST 2007
On Nov 9, 2007 1:41 PM, Jim Stinehart wrote:
> Yitzhak Sapir:
> Here are my answers to your three questions. (Pursuant to the good advice
> of George Athas, I will try to keep my posts short.)
> 1. Famed German scholar Gerhard von Rad, at p. 187 of his book "Genesis"
> (1961), paperback edition 1972, states:
> "The 'iniquity of the Amorites' is here [at Genesis 15: 16] to be understood
> as their sexual corruption…."
The original quote was:
> Do you realize that secular scholars, in
> their published works, try to tell us that "the iniquity of the Amorites" at
> Genesis 15: 16 refers to untoward sex practices of Gentiles in Lebanon?
I see nothing in the quote you brought above about Lebanon. In any case, the
book is 46 years old. That's old! You really should use more recent
and you should avoid the word "secular scholars" for actual names, especially
when it might just be one opinion amongst many.
> 2. To the best of my knowledge, in the last 40 years not a single scholar at
> a leading university in the West has written an article or book comparing
> the Amarna Letters with the Patriarchal narratives. No detailed debunking of
> any claimed comparison has been done either. There simply is nothing recent
> out there at all that has been published on this subject by any secular
> scholar at a leading university, to the best of my knowledge.
Well, the debunking goes hand in hand. You don't debunk a theory that isn't
proposed. If no one proposed it, why would anyone waste time debunking it?
Do you see anyone trying to debunk the theory that Martians are cute and
furry? However, that no one has written any article of comparison may just be
because no one thought it was a convincing case to be made. You have to
think you have a case before you sit down to write an article or book. This
doesn't mean that universities forbid them to consider the possibility. You
said they are not allowed to consider the possibility, not that they don't
consider the possibility possibly because they reject the idea very early.
As a short point, the only thing that really matches between the Patriarchal
narratives and the Amarna letters is the name of the king - Abimelekh vs.
Abimilki. But, this is a very common name. "Milku" (king) was an epithet
for Baal. That's where the Molekh comes from (possibly vocalized as
"boshet" - shame). We have all kinds of names, with deities or their
epithets and various family components in the name.
> 3. Probably the most famous Biblical Minimalist is Niels Peter Lemche. In
> his book "Prelude to Israel's Past" (1998) at p. 25, Niels Peter Lemche refers
> to the Patriarchal narratives as "fairy tales". To put that comment in
> some context, here is a little of pp. 24-25:
> "For the authors of the Pentateuch, the narratives are idyllic portrayals of
> the patriarchs…. We are moving in a world of fairy tales and sagas where
> mythical motifs are blended with legend."
> Although mainstream secular scholars would not use the inflammatory phrase
> "fairy tales", they in fact for the most part agree with most of Niels Peter
> Lemche's analysis of the Patriarchal narratives, at least in broad outline.
I think it is Thomas Thompson who you should really look up for an analysis of
the Patriarchal narratives. But in any case, if you yourself agree
secular scholars would not use the term, why do you put the term in
Furthermore, again, it is best to refer to the scholars (so far only
Lemche, and I
have to look up the quote to see if you omitted anything substantial) by name,
rather than say "anonymous scholars."
More information about the b-hebrew