[b-hebrew] Definite Article 7:14
torythrp at yahoo.com
Mon Jul 16 13:00:48 EDT 2007
On Jul 16, 2007, at 12:44 PM, dwashbur at nyx.net wrote:
> Once again, as Peter already pointed out, you retreat into the
> accusation that anybody who
> disagrees with you must be theologically or doctrinally motivated.
> You're the one with the
> conspiracy theory, not Karl or I. Obviously, it's a conspiracy by
> those rakkafrakka Christians
> to make you look silly...no, wait, you're doing that all yourself.
> Never mind.
What else would you call the insinuation of Hebraists altering the
meaning of almah because of christian dogma? How is that completely
unsubstantiated charge, a familiar one, acceptable in this forum but
my labeling it a conspiracy theory not?
More information about the b-hebrew