[b-hebrew] 2 Ki 2:10

Uri Hurwitz uhurwitz at yahoo.com
Thu Feb 22 09:41:26 EST 2007

  Dear Pere,
    The second.
    If it were the Qal passive participle, MS the text would be "Laquah.",
    the furtive patah,because of the het.
I read in an electronic search program (BibleWorks) that "LUQ.FX" (2Ki 2:10)   is a Qal passive participle, masculine singular absolute.  In DBD (page 544) I read it is a Pu'al form.  Which do you think is right?  If the right one is the second, would it be Pu'al construct Infinitive?      Pere Porta  

Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate
in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.

More information about the b-hebrew mailing list