[b-hebrew] 2 Ki 2:10

Uri Hurwitz uhurwitz at yahoo.com
Thu Feb 22 09:41:26 EST 2007


  Dear Pere,
   
    The second.
   
    If it were the Qal passive participle, MS the text would be "Laquah.",
    the furtive patah,because of the het.
   
    Uri
   
     
---------------------------------
  
I read in an electronic search program (BibleWorks) that "LUQ.FX" (2Ki 2:10)   is a Qal passive participle, masculine singular absolute.  In DBD (page 544) I read it is a Pu'al form.  Which do you think is right?  If the right one is the second, would it be Pu'al construct Infinitive?      Pere Porta  

 
---------------------------------
Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate
in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.


More information about the b-hebrew mailing list