[b-hebrew] The Name "Judah"

Bryant J. Williams III bjwvmw at com-pair.net
Wed Dec 19 12:07:38 EST 2007

Dear Jim,

The main reasons for the lack of scholars for not recognizing the puns in much
of the Tanakh especially the Torah of Moses is the adherence to the discredited
JEDP theory of Graf-Wellhausen, anti-Semitism and theology [especially with
revised Gnosticism and its use of allegorical interpretation,
anti-intellectualism, anti-Semitism, antinomianism/asceticism (depends on the
branch of Gnosticism) or amoralism; sounds like post-modernism (?)]. Let's face
it, most of the time the assumptions of scholars is not even questioned
especially the assumption that if it the Biblical text is speaking of theology
then it is NOT historical, scientific, etc.

Rev. Bryant J. Williams III
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <JimStinehart at aol.com>
To: <b-hebrew at lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 7:55 AM
Subject: [b-hebrew] The Name "Judah"

> 1.  The text of Genesis 29: 35 asserts, or at least appears to assert, that
> the name “Judah” is a pun on two words:  “praise”/YDH and YHWH.
> (a)  “YHWH” is obviously spelled Y-H-W-H.  If one puts in a D/dalet before
> the final H/heh in YHWH, one gets the name “Judah”:  Y-H-W-D-H.  Note that all
> the letters in “YHWH” are in YHWDH/”Judah”, and that all four such letters
> are in the correct order.
> (b)  The Hebrew verb “to praise” is spelled YDH.  If one adds both an H/heh
> and a W/vav after the yod/Y in YDH/“to praise”, one gets the name “Judah”:
> Y-H-W-D-H.  Note that all the letters in “YDH” are in YHWDH/”Judah”, and
> that all three such letters are in the correct order.
> (c)  Not only does YHWDH/”Judah” seem to be a logical and natural, if
> brilliant, pun on the two words “YHWH” and YDH/“to praise”, but also the text
> Genesis 29: 35 appears to explicitly make that very pun:
> “And she conceived again, and bore a son; and she said: 'This time will I
> praise [YDH] YHWH.'   Therefore she called his name Judah [YHWDH]…..”
> Note that the text does not say:  “This time will I give praise.”  No, the
> text puts the word YHWH right in there:  “This time will I praise YHWH.”
> 2.  Though the foregoing analysis seems quite convincing to me, it is never
> mentioned in the standard academic lengthy books on Genesis that have been
> published for a general readership.
> (a)  Gerhard von Rad, in his 440-page book “Genesis” (1961), states at p.
> 294:
> “The word [Levi] may not originally have been Hebrew.  …The same is true of
> the name Judah;  it too is originally a tribal name and has not yet been
> satisfactorily interpreted.”
> Note that Gerhard von Rad never mentions any puns regarding the name “Judah”.
> (b)  E.A. Speiser, in his 378-page book “Genesis” (1962), makes no comment
> at all about the name “Judah”.  Page 230 has a brief discussion of the name “
> Reuben”, but no discussion of any other names of Jacob’s 12 sons.
> (c)  Robert Alter, in his 324-page book “Genesis:  Translation and Commentary”
>  (1996), views the name “Judah” as solely being a play on one innocuous
> word, “praise”.  Prof. Alter states at p. 157:
> “The naming [of Judah] plays on ‘odey, ‘sing praise’, and Yehudah, ‘Judah’
> .  The verb Leah invokes is one that frequently figures in thanksgiving
> 3.  Note that none of the foregoing scholars says anything like the
> following:  “Although the text of Genesis 29: 35 asserts that “Judah”/YHWDH is
a pun
> on two words, “praise”/YDH and YHWH, we should reject that textual assertion.”
> 4.  Why are secular scholars so reluctant to admit that Genesis 29: 35 is
> naturally read as asserting that “Judah”/YHWDH is a pun on two words, “praise”
> /YDH and YHWH?
> We begin to see that the analysis I have been doing of the explicit puns that
> are explicitly set forth by the author of the Patriarchal narratives at the
> end of chapter 29 of Genesis is far more controversial than might appear at
> first glance.
> 5.  The scholarly analysis of these puns on the names of Jacob’s children
> consists of (i) asserting that these puns were made up many, many centuries
> the fact, and (ii) assuming, without any further analysis, that these puns
> have no particular significance, but rather are simple, enjoyable, fanciful
> that keep on repeating, over and over again, that Leah hopes that bearing
> more sons may make her husband Jacob love her.  The classic statement of that
> scholarly view is set forth in Gerhard von Rad’s book at p. 294:
> “Apparently there is here a very free etymological game in which the narrator
> sparkles, but which we cannot imitate.  We must, however, imagine that not
> the least of the charms of this passage for the ancient reader consisted in
> renewed suspense about how the next name (long familiar, of course) would be
> interpreted by the narrator.  So these are not, therefore, etymologies in the
> strict sense of the word and do not claim to be.  Rather, they are free
> allusions to which the narrator is inspired by the names and which the hearers
> receive as ingenious.”
> 6.  But if these puns on these names were made up many centuries after the
> fact, why would the name “Judah”, and no other name, work so beautifully as a
> pun on the words “praise”/YDH and YHWH?  And why do none of the scholars in
> their works for a general readership ever acknowledge such a pun on those two
> words?
> If the Patriarchal narratives are a myth that was created by multiple authors
> in the mid-1st millennium BCE, with the tribal name “Judah” long pre-dating
> the creation of the myth of the Patriarchal narratives, then why is it that
> only the name “Judah” works as a grand pun, in part, on the word YHWH?
> how could all the names of Jacob’s 12 sons work so well in the puns that we
> are examining on this thread?  And why don’t the secular scholars ever ask
> whether the puns are intended to foreshadow each son’s subsequent actions in
> later life?
> If the author of the Patriarchal narratives was the first Hebrew, who lived
> in the mid-2nd millennium BCE, before any Hebrew tribes were in existence (my
> view), then the received text makes perfect sense.  The author of the
> Patriarchal narratives has chosen and/or created these names for the 12 sons
of Jacob/“
> Israel”, and he has carefully made these choices of names in order to be able
> to do these wondrous puns, which deftly foreshadow each son’s future actions
> in the text.  But if the secular scholars are right and the Hebrew tribes, and
> their names, long pre-date (by many centuries) the composition of the myth of
> the Patriarchal narratives, how then could all these many puns on the names of
> Jacob’s sons work so beautifully?
> 7.  My claim that Genesis 29: 35 explicitly asserts that YDH + YHWH = YHWDH
> is much more controversial than may appear at first glance.  Such claim is
> never discussed by academic scholars in the long books they have published on
> Genesis for general readership.  That’s because such claim, if taken
> would undermine the scholars’ entire analysis of the Patriarchal narratives.
> In my view, there is nothing in the text that supports the scholarly
> contention that the Patriarchal narratives are a myth created by multiple
> Hebrew authors in the mid-1st millennium BCE.  As just one example of this, a
> fair reading of Genesis 29: 35 cannot be squared with that scholarly view.  It
> cannot be a mere “coincidence” that only the name “Judah” works as a pun, in
> part, on the word YHWH.
> Jim Stinehart
> Evanston, Illinois
> **************************************See AOL's top rated recipes
> (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)
> _______________________________________________
> b-hebrew mailing list
> b-hebrew at lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.17.4/1189 - Release Date: 12/18/07 9:40

For your security this Message has been checked for Viruses as a courtesy of Com-Pair Services!

More information about the b-hebrew mailing list