[b-hebrew] LC Internal Sederim Conflict (Brak)
Brak
Brak at neo.rr.com
Thu Jun 8 02:23:54 EDT 2006
Thanks for the reply. I noticed that as well that other texts have the
sedarim at 1 Sam 20:4.
Do you have any input to my post before this one in regards to the
"method behind the madness" in the selection of the sedarim breaks - as
many of them don't make much sense. Such as in the Minor Prophets.
The post in which I am referring to has the subject "Sederim Divisions"
Thanks again for the reply!
B"H
Brak
Daniel R. Pater wrote:
>Brak, you note a sedarim discrepency. In the Leningrad Codex (LC) masoretic
>list on folio 326r, the sedar 13 in the Book of Samuel indicates 20:5 by
>the words in the middle of the verse "Lo, behold, t[omorrow]", while the
>division marking itself is found in the text at I Sam 20:4 (folio 161v,
>bottom of second column).
>
>I consulted Aleppo ad loc.and there also the Sedar division 13 indicates
>20:4. You can confirm this at http://www.aleppocodex.org/aleppocodex.html).
>BHK and BHS reproduce the same.
>
>So, can we presume we're dealing with a scribal error? I don't really have
>immediate access to anything but genral information on the sedarim and
>errors in the LC masoretic lists. It will be interesting to see what others
>have to say about this.
>
>Daniel R. Pater
>
>_______________________________________________
>b-hebrew mailing list
>b-hebrew at lists.ibiblio.org
>http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
>
>
>
More information about the b-hebrew
mailing list