[b-hebrew] Lev 21:18 - Passive Participle
kwrandolph at email.com
Sat Oct 29 17:10:01 EDT 2005
I was making the argument that Jack may be correct as to
how he understands XRM, and if so, then all uses of XRM
reflect the same action with the same spelling. Only Arabic
differs. If Jack is correct, then the evidence contradicts the
claim that these uses reflect different roots.
Karl W. Randolph.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Kirk" <peter at qaya.org>
> On 29/10/2005 15:25, Karl Randolph wrote:
> > ... Your evidence (other than from Arabic) contradicts your
> > claims that there are different roots.
> What other evidence? I know of no evidence other than from Arabic
> which has a bearing on the matter. If the Arabic evidence did not
> exist you might be justified in using Occam's razor, but that is
> not evidence.
> -- Peter Kirk
> peter at qaya.org (personal)
> peterkirk at qaya.org (work)
Play 100s of games for FREE! http://games.mail.com/
More information about the b-hebrew