[b-hebrew] TT:NAH in Ps 8 a corruption?
ben.crick at argonet.co.uk
Thu Mar 24 17:50:00 EST 2005
On Thu 24 Mar 2005 (16:37:08 +0000), kgraham0938 at comcast.net wrote:
> Hey what does everyone think about Psalm 8:1
> 'A$ER TT:NAH HODKA, do you think this [TT:NAH]is a corruption of the
> second masculine NTTH or imperfect TTN.
[Verse 2 in the BHS.]
This is the Qal 2ms imperative of NTN, a Pe Nun verb meaning to give or to
set. The initial Nun disappears, and the medial Taw is the first letter.
It has a Daghesh lene, meaning it is pronounced as a hard T and not Th
(one of the letters Be:GaD:KePaT). But the sense "Set thou thy glory..." does
not fit the context; so yes, there is a corruption: or at least an obscurity.
Some emend the Imperative to a Perfect "who hast set thy glory...", which
yields good sense. The LXX has EPHRQH hH MEGALOPREPIA SOU hUPERANW TWN
OURANWN, so maybe the Hebrew text which the Seventy had before them had
the Perfect. This is supported by the Targum, the Syriac, Symmachus and
Jerome in his Vulgate. Compare Psalm 21:4 [5 in BHS] where we have
XaYYiM $a'aL MiMM:Ka *NaTaTTaH* LoW "he asked life of thee, thou gavest
(it) to him". Compare also Numbers 27:20 and 1 Chronicles 21:25.
Revd Ben Crick, BA CF ZFC Lu
<ben.crick at NOSPAM.argonet.co.uk>
232 Canterbury Road, Birchington, Kent, CT7 9TD (UK)
*Acorn RPC700, RO4.03+Kinetic Card, 126MB, 4.3GB HD, x32CDROM
*Castle Iyonix X100, RO5.06, 600MHz XScale processor, 512MB DDR RAM,
114GB HD, CD-RW, etc. *Ethernet networking.
More information about the b-hebrew