[b-hebrew] Yahwism (was: their altar)

Peter Kirk peterkirk at qaya.org
Wed Mar 16 12:59:26 EST 2005

On 16/03/2005 17:45, George F Somsel wrote:

>On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:16:04 +0000 Peter Kirk <peterkirk at qaya.org>
>> ...
>>I didn't actually say this. For one thing I didn't mention 
>>And then I was only pointing out that certain evidence for later 
>>authorship which someone had put forward was in fact very weak 
>>for later true authorship rather than redaction. I consider the 
>>issue to 
>>be open, not clearly proved either way.
>You didn't say it, but if you said it you meant " . . . "
>Am I reading you correctly?
No. I am stating that "X may have committed the crime, but the evidence 
currently presented is weak, insufficient for a successful prosecution" 
- in fact even insufficient for the lesser burden of proof which applies 
in such cases.


>Ah, yes, the old "we just haven't found the evidence yet" argument.  What
>would you say if we were to dig up the entire country?  We didn't dig
>deep enough?  We're on the wrong side of the Jordon?
I am just holding to the principle of "innocent until proved guilty". 
And a negative cannot be proved. So what is the positive proof?

Peter Kirk
peter at qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk at qaya.org (work)

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.7.3 - Release Date: 15/03/2005

More information about the b-hebrew mailing list