peterkirk at qaya.org
Wed Jul 27 06:56:59 EDT 2005
On 27/07/2005 07:39, Rolf Furuli wrote:
>In connection with the cancelability/noncancelability of characteristics we
>can perhaps speak of three groups of verbs:
>1) Verbs where the particular characteristic easily is blotted out or
>changed by the context, and it is clearly seen that the characteristic is
>2) Verbs where the characteristic is not blotted out or changed by the
>context, except in special cases, such as idiomatic use, illustrative use,
>slang, idiosyncratic or substandard use.
>3) Verbs where the characteristic cannot be blotted out by the context.
>I do not have a list of all the verbs that have semantic characteristics. My
>task, therefore, is to
>demonstrate the existence of verbs belonging to group 3. So let us look at
>some Hebrew examples.
I am happy to distinguish your groups 1 and 2, although not convinced
that there is a hard distinction between the two - at least when moving
synchronically between different registers of the same language.
However, I remain sceptical that there are any verbs or other words in
group 3, in any language. It seems that Dave and Joel agree with me, and
both of them seem to know their linguistics.
And, even if there are group 3 verbs, I don't think you will be able to
demonstrate this from biblical Hebrew. The best that you can demonstrate
is that there is no evidence of the characteristic being blotted out in
any of the contexts found in the Hebrew Bible, and the small amount of
inscriptional material. But the size of the corpus limits the variety of
those contexts, and its nature means that there are especially few of
the informal conversational contexts (let alone "slang, idiosyncratic or
substandard use") in which characteristics are most likely to be blotted
peter at qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk at qaya.org (work)
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.9.5/58 - Release Date: 25/07/2005
More information about the b-hebrew