[b-hebrew] YHWH discussion recap
peterkirk at qaya.org
Mon Jul 25 10:51:19 EDT 2005
On 25/07/2005 15:16, Read, James C wrote:
> Peter wrote:
> "I am not convinced that this is a fair summary. I don't think that
> authors like Gertoux, Gordon and Franklin have been taken at all
> seriously by the scholarly world. I am not saying that they shouldn't
> be, but that they are outsiders. I don't think any of them have a
> recognised academic position, and I have not seen publications by them
> in peer reviewed academic journals."
> Forgive me if this is a wrong opinion but seeing as the title of
> 'scholar' is one that men bestow upon men it hardly seems to be
> an appropriate observation that brings anything of worth to the
> discussion. ...
James, I brought in the word "scholarly" only because Steven referred to
the "consensus on a scholarly forum" and to "scholarship". Steven seemed
to argue that the self-perpetuating group of "scholars" whose consensus
since the 19th century has been for "Yahwe" had changed its mind. But I
see no evidence of this. That same group of "scholars" continues to
support "Yahwe" and is largely unaware of the arguments of outsiders to
whom they would pay little attention.
Whether the "scholars" are right or wrong is a different matter. I
happen to think they are right in this case, not because of their titles
and qualifications but because of their arguments.
peter at qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk at qaya.org (work)
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.9.4/57 - Release Date: 22/07/2005
More information about the b-hebrew