[b-hebrew] Aramaic - Abba
Harold R. Holmyard III
hholmyard at ont.com
Sun Jul 24 21:17:20 EDT 2005
>Thank you for the correction, in fact I simply misread the N-A text.
>But the textual evidence in Nestle-Aland is very uncertain, and in
>fact several early MSS (B, D, theta) do have LAMA. Also, was the
>Aramaic word really LEMA with a clear E vowel, or was the first
>vowel a sheva? I ask because sheva as well as qamats was usually
>transliterated as alpha in Greek, in NT, LXX etc. So the epsilon
>here seems to be a corrupt form whether the original was Hebrew or
HH: The fact that sheva was usually transliterated as alpha in Greek
does not mean that it always was. Two text critical sources for "why"
in Mark 15:34 give "lima" and "lema, " so the letter "i" or the
letter "e" is how they would represent the sheva on the Aramaic word
for "why." The Septuagint transliterates sheva as "i" in the word
"Lebanon" at Josh 11:7. It transliterates sheva as "e" in the word
Lebonah at Judges 21:19. So neither the iota nor the epsilon in
lema/lima at Mark 15:34 has to be a corrupt form.
More information about the b-hebrew