[b-hebrew] masorete pointing v's LLX transliterations
furuli at online.no
Sun Jul 24 10:22:03 EDT 2005
The answer is clearly No. We cannot learn anything regarding the old
pronunciation of Hebrew from the LXX. The Masoretes were extremely careful
when they copied the text, and we have every reason to believe that their
vocalization represented the pronunciation that was used in B.C.E.
A curiosity: This year I defended my doctoral dissertation, which gives a
completely new definition of the finite and infinite verbs of classical
Hebrew. In this work I argue that Hebrew has only two conjugations and not
four, and that the so-called consecutive forms were invented by the
Masoretes. One of my opponents, from the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, had
problems in understanding how I could view the Masoretes as extremely
faithful copyists and at the same time say that they invented the
consecutive forms. We had a very lively discussion about this, were he gave
many examples of the faithfulness of the Masoretes.
University of Oslo
----- Original Message -----
From: "Read, James C" <K0434995 at kingston.ac.uk>
To: <b-hebrew at lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2005 2:33 PM
Subject: [b-hebrew] masorete pointing v's LLX transliterations
> I don't have an opinion in this regard but recent discussions
> have made me wonder:
> Could it be that the pointing of the masoretes only show the
> pronunciation of the period?
> And that thus we cannot look to them as a good source for
> archaic vowel pronunciation?
> And that consequently the older LLX transliterations give a
> better source for understanding archaic vowel pronunciation?
> (within their limitations)
> While the hebrew text helps us to put the consonants in the
> right places that the LLX transliterations were incapable of
> Any thoughts on the matter, much appreciated.
> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
> Security System.
> b-hebrew mailing list
> b-hebrew at lists.ibiblio.org
More information about the b-hebrew