[b-hebrew] The translation of ehyeh
B. M. Rocine
brocine at twcny.rr.com
Fri Aug 5 16:24:03 EDT 2005
Thank you Peter for adding some helpful details to the discussion.
I can also add that in all the uses of ehyeh in the Scriptures only Exo
3:14 and Hos 14:6 use the word in the clause-initial position. Most
especially, I notice in YHWH's speech, ehyeh (when in an independent
clause) is usually preceded by pleonastic 'ani or 'anokiy. I take this
information as a signal to read Exo 3:14's ehyeh as special, suspecting
that it is an expression of desire (a cohortative) rather than
knowledge. I take ehyeh 'asher ehyeh to mean, "I intend to be what I
always am." Of course, "be" and "am" are not entirely equivalent to the
use of the root hyh in Exo 3:14.
Peter Kirk wrote:
> On 05/08/2005 11:12, B. M. Rocine wrote:
>> I am not sure what you mean by "sequential yiqtols." In my posts
>> about Isaiah 52-53 and Psa 107, I tried to maintain a consistent
>> interpretation of clause-initial yiqtols as volitive. I think there
>> were a couple of exceptions.
>> This model has import for the study of syntax and verbal semantics.
>> An interesting pattern emerges of we study the distribution of clause
>> types in BH. Most of the BH genres have a mainline of communication
>> that utilizes a verb-first clause type. Historical narrative
>> discourse uses the wayyiqtol; Predictive narrative uses the weqatal;
>> Hortatory discourse uses clause-initial forms based on the yiqtol like
>> the imperative, jussive, and cohortative, to name a few.
> Bryan, are you effectively saying that the volitive clause-initial
> YIQTOLs you refer to are jussives and cohortatives? In that case, they
> will typically be based on an apocopated or shortened form of YIQTOL
> which, at least according to one widespread theory, has a quite
> different origin form regular YIQTOL. And so that would explain why the
> same surface form has two different meanings - the forms were originally
> different but have come together because of phonological change.
> In fact the situation is a little more complex for the first EHYEH, if
> this is in fact to be understood as cohortative, for this is a
> "lamed-he" verb which has a distinct apocopated form. The cohortative is
> generally formed from the (rare) 1st person of the jussive with a
> suffixed he. The 3rd person jussive of HYH is Y:HIY (Genesis 1:3 etc).
> No cohortative version is attested, but one would expect the consonants
> )HYH, as in Ehyeh, and probably in fact the same form Ehyeh. So the
> first Ehyeh could be cohortative, and the sentence could be translated
> "Let me be what I am", which might well mean something like "Don't try
> to control me!"
B. M. Rocine
Living Word Chruch
6101 Court St. Rd.
Syracuse, NY 13026
More information about the b-hebrew