[b-hebrew] OT- perspective (was Josiah's book of the Law)
kwrandolph at email.com
Fri Aug 5 14:17:41 EDT 2005
----- Original Message -----
From: "Yitzhak Sapir" <yitzhaksapir at gmail.com>
> I would like to think that a linguist in this case doesn't make any
> a priori assumptions regarding the dates of the documents but
> deduces this dates from linguistic criteria alone. ...
> Yitzhak Sapir
This would work if and only if all languages changed
according to the same pattern at the same rate. But
historically, that is not the case with languages where we
have somewhat accurate models of change based on a large
corpus of datable materials. From historical records, we
can see that even the rate of change within a language can
vary, with some rather major changes occurring within a few
generations, then remaining largely static for centuries.
Another problem is that languages change in different ways,
so that language change patterns in one language cannot be
a predictor of how a different language will change.
A further problem with Biblical Hebrew is that we have such
a small corpus with variations so minor that they could be
individual stylistic usage patterns instead of reflecting
language changes, in fact those changes are so small that
some could reflect stylistic changes within a single
individual's writing as he ages or changes subject matter.
Karl W. Randolph.
Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
More information about the b-hebrew