Fwd: Re: [b-hebrew] Review of Alter's Translation
uhurwitz at yahoo.com
Wed Oct 27 17:46:19 EDT 2004
Peter Kirk <peterkirk at qaya.org> wrote:
If the vocabulary is restricted, it is surely only because the subject
matter is restricted. For eaxmple, there is no recorded word for "cat",
but that is not because this word was somehow excluded from a restricted
subset of Hebrew which biblical authors were permitted to use, it was
simply because none of the biblical authors happened to need to refer to
cats. If they had needed to refer to them, or to any other features of
daily life which don't happen to be recorded in the Bible, they would
surely have used the appropriate commonly used words."...
Yes, and we have extra-biblical, arachaeological evidence of words that were in use and never appeared in BH texts.
What comes to mind is the the term NS(.)P for a unit of weight. This is familiar from the Arabic where it simply means "half", but in the excavated notated example it is a larger fraction of the Shekel,conssidered the standard unit of weight.
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
More information about the b-hebrew