[b-hebrew] 998 non-past wyyqtl's
dwashbur at nyx.net
Tue Nov 30 12:47:57 EST 2004
On Tuesday 30 November 2004 10:22, Peter Kirk wrote:
> On 30/11/2004 17:00, Dave Washburn wrote:
> > ...
> >Hi Peter,
> >I don't claim that "meaning" is encoded in a form, in fact that was my
> >question, and that was why I brought in the citations from other
> > grammarians who do in fact make such a claim. I'm not sure where I stand
> > on this question, which is why I'm so interested to hear Bryan expand on
> > his comments. That said, I'll be happy to look at your paper, and I hope
> > we'll be able to interact about it some when I get done. Can you suggest
> > one (fairly easily obtainable!) introductory work on Relevance Theory
> > that I can examine in addition?
> Thanks for the clarification.
> I would recommend that you look at: E-A. Gutt, Translation and
> Relevance: Cognition and Context, 2nd edition, St. Jerome, Manchester
> 2000. This starts with a clear introduction to the theory as a whole,
> partly in the context of biblical texts. I disagree with how Gutt has
> applied it to translation, but that is the thrust of my paper.
Quick question, because I'll have to get it by ILL: is St. Jerome the
"No good. Hit on head." -Gronk
More information about the b-hebrew