[b-hebrew] Determination Hebrew vs. Aramaic

Trevor Peterson abuian at access4less.net
Mon Nov 15 13:20:40 EST 2004

----- Original Message Follows -----
From: "C. Stirling Bartholomew"
<jacksonpollock at earthlink.net>
To: hebrew <b-hebrew at lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: [b-hebrew] Determination Hebrew vs. Aramaic 
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 10:01:11 -0800

> I assume this means the -a suffix in Aramaic is not
> functionally "equivalent" to the prefixed Hebrew h.

Yes, I would say that's correct. Although there is also the
matter of diachronic change, since later dialects tend to
move more in the direction of a default determined state.

> This
> however leaves me a little confused as to what to make of
> the -a suffix. For example, if we encounter a determiner +
> noun in a translated text but we do not know if the
> original was Hebrew or Aramaic, does the presence of the
> determiner present us with a different set of issues with
> an Aramaic original than it would in Hebrew?

I would say it does. Then, of course, there's the question
of translation style--was the translator trying to represent
the determiner woodenly, or was there more sensitivity to
the different function of the determiner in the source and
target languages.

Trevor Peterson

More information about the b-hebrew mailing list