[b-hebrew] Exodus and Hebrew Language
formoria at carolina.rr.com
Sun May 30 07:41:19 EDT 2004
So what do you say about Jack's assertion that the script of the Izbet
Sartah inscription is proto-Canaanite?
I guess if we were to take the harmonization route here, we'd come up
with an Israelite village where a Philistine child was learning
Canaanite. (Sorry, couldn'y resist).
On a more serious note, do scholars assume that literacy in the ANE was
an on-off phenomenon or was there a scale of degrees of literacy like we
On Saturday, May 29, 2004, at 07:31 PM, Yigal Levin wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> The Izbet Sartah inscription is assumed to be"Hebrew" because it was
> in the archaeological context of a typical Iron I hill-country village -
> typical in pottery, architecture, plan etc. Izbet Sartah is as Iron I
> "Israelite" as there is. Now, it is possible to argue just what
> means in the 12-11th centuries and would the inhabitants have actually
> that term, but what would have been the linguistic difference between a
> Canaanite village and an Israelite one, anyway?
> From: "Jack Kilmon" <jkilmon at historian.net>
>> I am not sure what it is that makes the Izbet Sartah inscription
>> The script is proto-Canaanite. Is it considered Israelite because the
>> abecedary had..or was supposed to have..22 letters? Hebrew is a
>> that used the Canaanite script and some centuries later, adopted the
>> script...but a script is not a language, is not a culture. This
>> could have been the exercise of a Philistine child learning Canaanite.
>> Maybe there is something I am missing here.
>> b-hebrew mailing list
>> b-hebrew at lists.ibiblio.org
> b-hebrew mailing list
> b-hebrew at lists.ibiblio.org
More information about the b-hebrew