[b-hebrew] Isaiah 53

Dave Washburn dwashbur at nyx.net
Sun May 16 10:23:26 EDT 2004

I suggest you spend some serious time in the archives before making such a 
statement.  There have been beaucoup discussions of this very question and 
it's far from settled.  Don't try to treat it as though it's a done deal, 
because it most definitely isn't.

On Sunday 16 May 2004 01:43, unikom at paco.net wrote:
> Dear Rolf,
> You can't be serious on that. Out of head, 90% of wa's reverse the tense.
> Those that don't represent probably the same percentage of the erroneous
> tenses as encountered in the verbs without wa. Wa's overwhelmingly do
> reverse the tense, wouldn't you agree with this?
> conclusion, there is no evidence that qatal and weqatal are separate
> and independent conjugations or that they have different origins.
> I agree that there is no difference between the two forms - weqatal
> is a qatal with the conjunction WAW prefixed.<
> Best regards,
> Vadim
> _______________________________________________
> b-hebrew mailing list
> b-hebrew at lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew

Dave Washburn
Learning about Christianity from a non-Christian
is like getting a kiss over the telephone.

More information about the b-hebrew mailing list