[b-hebrew] Fw: WAYYIQTOL
dwashbur at nyx.net
Fri Mar 12 19:53:13 EST 2004
On Friday 12 March 2004 05:40, George Athas wrote:
> Hi Peter (and others)!
> I am arguing for two distinct verb forms -- that is, a differentiation
> between the verbal element of WAYYIQTOL forms (wayYIQTOL), and the pure
> Imperfect YIQTOL. I believe there to be a distinct aspectual difference
> between the two. This is *not* based on an understanding that WAYYIQTOL is
> really a YIQTOL with a waw that inverts the tense. I think that is an
> erroneous view. I understand the Preterite, which stands behind WAYYIQTOL
> forms, to have had a different aspect to the Imperfect YIQTOL. As such,
> this removes the need to see the waw consecutive as a necessarily distinct
> type of waw.
I'm not sure I follow you here. If it's not a "distinct type of waw" then how
does it alter the aspect of the verb? Also, how do you go about identifying
the verb element as either a preterite or a "pure imperfect YIQTOL"? And I
don't see WeYIQTOL described; how does it fit into this schema? Please
develop the idea further...
Learning about Christianity from a non-Christian
is like getting a kiss over the telephone.
More information about the b-hebrew