[b-hebrew] chet bet lamed (nehemiah1:7)
kwrandolph at email.com
Thu Jun 24 21:02:23 EDT 2004
Having lived in both predominently rural and predominently urban areas of the country, I found out a lot about agriculture just watching TV, even in university and industrial cities with well over 100,000 population but surrounded by crops: so many advertisements were for fertilizers, tactors, combines, insecticides and herbecides, etc. Even among those who were not connected with agriculture, they were aware of the agriculture around them.
Now that I live in an urban area, I miss those connections with agriculture.
Was ancient Jerusalem larger than a few tens of thousands at most, many of whom still worked their fields around the city? A writer in that era would have had to have been pretty dense not to have cogniscence of the agriculture around him.
Karl W. Randolph.
----- Original Message -----
From: Peter Kirk <peterkirk at qaya.org>
> On 22/06/2004 23:04, Yigal Levin wrote:
> >I once heard Prof. Yehuda Feliks lecture on how many "mistakes" the author
> >of the Song made in his understanding of nature. The way he put it,
> >"Solomon" was a great poet, but he was a city boy who really had no idea
> >what how vinyard worked.
> In the light of Harold's reply, I wonder whether the true city boy was
> "Solomon" or Prof Feliks.
> Bear in mind that Jerusalem at the time the Song was written (almost
> whenever that might have been) was only a small town by modern standards
> and probably surrounded by vineyards. Any travel would have been at
> walking pace, leaving plenty of time to observe the surrounding
> vineyards and talk to those who worked in them. The author, unless
> brought up in a very sheltered palace environment, would not have been
> nearly as unfamiliar with vineyards as city boys today.
> Peter Kirk
> peter at qaya.org (personal)
> peterkirk at qaya.org (work)
Talk More, Pay Less with Net2Phone Direct(R), up to 1500 minutes free!
More information about the b-hebrew