[b-hebrew] Kadeshah

Karl Randolph kwrandolph at email.com
Wed Jul 14 20:24:26 EDT 2004


You are assuming that ancient Israel’s historians would not write anything unless they approved of them, which was the practice of much of the ancient Levant. Others take the understanding that those historians were so demanding of historical accuracy that they included, warts and all, failings of the patriarchs as well as their greatnesses. The second understanding allows accurate records to be made without assuming approval of what is condemned elsewhere.

If we take the traditional view that all of Tanakh is to be counted as context for all other parts, then Malachi 3:6 that says that God doesn’t change also includes his condemnation of immorality. In that regard, what Judah did with Tamar was wrong. In fact, so wrong that there was no need to dwell on it.

Karl W. Randolph.

----- Original Message -----
From: <david.kimbrough at charter.net>

> While later traditions certainly condemns the ritual prostitutes, in Genesis 38 Judah thinks nothing too much amiss of making use of what he thinks is a road side *kadeshah*, who is, of course, is actually is daughter in law Tamar.  Whenever Genesis 38 was writen, the author (and audiance) obviously did not think using the services of *kadeshah* too taboo or the author would not have had one of the patriarchs doing so.
Talk More, Pay Less with Net2Phone Direct(R), up to 1500 minutes free! 

More information about the b-hebrew mailing list