[b-hebrew] Isaiah 53:8 lamo

Peter Kirk peterkirk at qaya.org
Sat Dec 18 18:22:23 EST 2004


On 18/12/2004 17:23, Vadim Cherny wrote:

> ...
>
>
>Besides the fact that all lamo refer to plural, ...
>

This, if you remember, was the original point at issue. The argument was 
that in Isaiah 53:8 and several other places it is very difficult for 
lamo to be plural.

>... you need to dwell into etymology of lamo ...
>

Or speculate on the etymology of lamo. A derivation from lahem is 
possible, but by no means certain.


-- 
Peter Kirk
peter at qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk at qaya.org (work)
http://www.qaya.org/





More information about the b-hebrew mailing list