[b-hebrew] Relevance Theory & Hebrew Semantics

kwrandolph at email.com kwrandolph at email.com
Tue Aug 17 18:08:39 EDT 2004


This “intended to make sense” is exactly the reason I question the Masoritic points at times. While most sentences in Tanakh are simple and make sense, the difficult ones often become simple when one removes the points, then look for the possibilities. Often the verses preceding and following indicate which of the possibilities to choose based on continuation of an idea. Often I find that one possibility gives a simple reading and any other possibility leaves us with mental gymnastics to try to make every word fit.

I don’t know exactly how this relates to Relevance Theory, other than making the text make sense may affect the relevance of individual verses.

Karl W. Randolph.

----- Original Message -----
From: Peter Kirk <peterkirk at qaya.org>

> The axiom is basically that the text is intended to make sense, to 
> communicate a message, at least to its target audience, in other words 
> that it is not a random collection of words. If we abandon this axiom we 
> may as well abandon any attempt to understand the text, because it is 
> meaningless.

> -- 
> Peter Kirk
> peter at qaya.org (personal)
> peterkirk at qaya.org (work)
> http://www.qaya.org/
Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com

More information about the b-hebrew mailing list