[b-hebrew] Relevance Theory & Hebrew Semantics
peterkirk at qaya.org
Tue Aug 17 13:49:09 EDT 2004
On 17/08/2004 17:18, C. Stirling Bartholomew wrote:
>Peter Kirk wrote:
>>The rather similarproject on which I have been working (see
>>http://www.ktbh-team.org/) has had a lot of input from cognitive linguists
>>who are also experts on RT. From my own perspective, this input has been
>>hard to assimilate; in principle it should make for a very good product but
>>in practice the effort required to get there looks unrealistic.
>I read the relevant portions of your paper "Holy Communicative" and it
>sounds like Ernst-August Gutt has raised some very good questions about DE
>translation methodology. While I applaud his efforts, that issue is somewhat
>outside of my current focus which is semantics defined in a broad sense
>(spilling into pragmatics somewhat).
>My goal is to develop a working model for defining cognitive frames.
>Relevance Theory looks like it might significantly contribute to the
>theoretical structure for a project of this nature, so I am taking a look at
>it. As a test case the verb CWR (Ex. 32:4) provides a problem challenging
>enough to smoke out weakness in the theoretical model.
Clay, I only criticised a very small part of Gutt's argument. Plenty of
what he has written deals with application of RT to written texts, and
not only to translation. I would advise you to read his book if you want
to understand the application of RT to ancient texts.
peter at qaya.org (personal)
peterkirk at qaya.org (work)
More information about the b-hebrew