Banyai at t-online.de
Fri Aug 13 15:20:00 EDT 2004
Curiously I was not able to recognise in the last couple of postings, how they touched to the subject Amalek. However did Peter Kirk formulated an interesting idea which deserves elaboration:
> I consider it highly probable that a traditional genealogy among the
> Edomites listed Esau as their original founder and Amalek as his
> grandson. I also consider it highly probable that such a genealogy is
> reasonably accurate (although perhaps giving a succession of leaders
> rather than a strict father-to-son listing), and that said Amalek became
> the leader of a group which became known as the Amalekites, even if he
> was not necessarily the biological ancestor of all of them.
I would like to point to the Phoenician cosmogony according to Sanchiunaton as related by Filon of Byblos and Eusebius of Cesarea, mentioning a certain pair of rival has brothers, one of whom being called Usoos (like Esau), a hunter, who has invented fur clothes. This cosmogony seems to be confirmed as genuine by its recognisable Ugarit parallels. There existed thus an independent semitic tradition concerning Esau/Usoos, who was assimilated by the bible writers with Edom.
The way how this story slipped into the Bible may have been the identification of some Edom - a historical brother of a proto-Israelite king (we may call him for conveniency Jacob) - with the eponymous ancestor of the Edomites Esau.
There exists an Egyptian inscription concerning a certain Abdi-damu (or later Hebrew: Obed-Edom) brother of the "prince" of Retenu, taking part into a mining expedition into the Sinai, just on the wake of the massive (and apparently friendly)immigration of Semites into the Delta under Amenemhat III during the late 12-th dynasty.
More information about the b-hebrew